Lundh v. Great Northern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate who was killed in a collision between an auto in which he was riding and a train of the defendant. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
There was evidence from which the jury could find negligence in the defendant. There was no error in the general charge nor in the refusal of the court to give instructions requested by the defendant. Nothing requires discussion except the defendant’s contention that the deceased was negligent as a matter of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kokesh v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Howe v. Minneapolis, Saint Paul & Sault Sainte Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Follman v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Zenner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Carnegie v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Manos v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Vukos v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Jones v. SchreiberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Fitzgerald v. Village of BoveySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Billingsley v. McCormick Transfer Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1929