Legal Opinion

Grant v. Artis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1960No. 306PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER Cüeiam:.

The male defendant Walter Artis, individually, does not deny owing the amount plaintiff sues for. The feme defendant Geneva Artis contends that she and her husband made no contract with plaintiff, that the contract was entered into between plaintiff and her husband, and assigns as error the overruling of her motion for judgment of involuntary nonsuit renewed at the close of all the evidence. Accepting plaintiff’s evidence as true, and considering his evidence in the light most favorable to him, and giving to him the benefit of' every reasonable intendment upon the evidence and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. RawlinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Wynne v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Guy Frye & Sons, Inc. v. FrancisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. UnderhillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Whitehead ex rel. Whitehead v. MargelDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API