State v. Smith
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
By his first assignment of error the defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a voir dire hearing as to the legality of the prosecuting witness’ in-court identification of the defendant. Although the better practice dictates “that the trial judge, even upon a general objection only, should conduct a voir dire in the absence of the jury, find facts, and thereupon determine the admissibility of in-court identification testimony . . . [f] ailure to conduct the voir dire . . . does not necessarily render such evidence incompetent.” State v. Stepney,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Grant v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. HerenciaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976