Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1974No. 7412SC205PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

By his first assignment of error the defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a voir dire hearing as to the legality of the prosecuting witness’ in-court identification of the defendant. Although the better practice dictates “that the trial judge, even upon a general objection only, should conduct a voir dire in the absence of the jury, find facts, and thereupon determine the admissibility of in-court identification testimony . . . [f] ailure to conduct the voir dire . . . does not necessarily render such evidence incompetent.” State v. Stepney,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. StepneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Grant v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. HerenciaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API