Legal Opinion

Wynne v. Allen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1957No. 240PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

Experience has demonstrated that respect for and adherence to our statutory methods of procedure facilitates proper disposition of litigation. Our statute provides that the court shall, when a jury trial is waived, make separate findings of fact and conclusions of law. G.S. 1-185. Findings of fact so made may be challenged by exceptions. When not so challenged or when so challenged and supported by any evidence, they are conclusive on appeal.

The agreement to disregard the statute deprives us of the benefit of specific findings of fact, presenting to us instead a verdict.

A general verdict is…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. United States v. Harvey Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. American Bonding Co. of Baltimore v. Pueblo Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Kinsman v. ParkhurstSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  4. Monger v. . LutterlohSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Drackett Chemical Co. v. Chamberlain Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hartley v. BallouSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Moore v. HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Harrelson Ex Rel. Randolph v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Ogilvie v. MangelsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  5. Daniels v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API