Legal Opinion

Guy Frye & Sons, Inc. v. Francis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 13, 1955No. 317PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

A motion to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the greater weight of the evidence is directed to the sound discretion of the presiding judge, whose ruling, in the absence of abuse of discretion, is not reviewable on appeal. G.S. 1-207; Poniros v. Teer Co., 236 N.C. 145, 72 S.E. 2d 9; Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N.C. 808, 161 S.E. 686. See also Roberts v. Hill, 240 N.C. 373, bot. p. 380, 82 S.E. 2d 373.

Similarly, a motion for new trial on the ground of new evidence, discovered during the trial term, is addressed to the discretion of the trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Goodman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Roberts v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Carson v. . DellingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. Bullock v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Poniros v. Nello L. Teer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Worthington v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Caudle v. SwansonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Mason v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Green v. Eastern Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API