Legal Opinion

Hughes v. City of Carlsbad

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1949No. 5163PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SADLER, Justice.

The appellants, as plaintiffs below, some 200 in number, sued in the district court of Eddy County to enjoin the City of Carlsbad, a municipal corporation, its may- or and city council, from annexing to the municipality a certain area described in the complaint, lying west of, but contiguous to, the corporate limits of the city. From a summary judgment dismissing their complaint, the plaintiffs prosecute this appeal.

In conducting the proceedings for annexation the city has proceeded under 1941 Comp. §§ 14-606 to 14-608, both inclusive. The enabling act employed was adopted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schreffler v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  2. Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Automatic Radio Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1948
  3. Heirich v. HoweNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Ades v. Supreme Lodge Order of AhepaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
  5. McGraw v. MerrymanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cole-Collister Fire Protection District v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Torres v. Village of CapitanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Boise City v. Better Homes, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Mutz v. Municipal Boundary CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Dugger v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API