Legal Opinion

Schreffler v. Bowles

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 12, 1946No. 3188PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to Section 205(e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, 1 appellee, as Price Administrator of the Office of Price Administration, instituted an action against appellants for treble damages for alleged violations of Revised Price Regulation No. 49, as amended, in the alleged purchase and resale of steel products. An amended complaint was filed which had attached to it Exhibit A. This exhibit contained an itemized list of sales, names of purchasers, purchase order numbers, dates of shipments, invoice numbers, net cost to the purchasers, allowable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Indianapolis Glove Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  2. Wells Lamont Corporation v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Sabin v. Home Owners' Loan Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Robert C. Hahn v. Francis W. SargentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
  2. Bruce Construction Corporation v. United States of America for Use of Westinghouse Electric Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. Sparkman v. McWhirterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Avrick v. Rockmont Envelope Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  5. Brick v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API