Legal Opinion

Raulston v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 1992No. 2654 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Judge.

The present appeal presents the sole question of whether the attorney for a claimant who was awarded workmen’s compensation benefits is entitled, as part of his fee agreement with claimant, to a percentage of the reimbursement for medical bills in addition to a percentage of the weekly benefits paid to claimant.

Dennis Raulston (claimant) sustained a work-related injury on August 16, 1982, while working for Tri-State Motor Transit Company (employer). On December 20,1984, claimant filed a claim petition and was subsequently awarded workmen’s compensation benefits. The referee’s…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Koszowski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Fuhrman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. General Machine Products Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Henderson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Langford v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Piergalski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Larry Pitt & Associates, P.C. v. ButlerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. John A. Miller & Associates, Ltd. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API