Raulston v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Judge.
The present appeal presents the sole question of whether the attorney for a claimant who was awarded workmen’s compensation benefits is entitled, as part of his fee agreement with claimant, to a percentage of the reimbursement for medical bills in addition to a percentage of the weekly benefits paid to claimant.
Dennis Raulston (claimant) sustained a work-related injury on August 16, 1982, while working for Tri-State Motor Transit Company (employer). On December 20,1984, claimant filed a claim petition and was subsequently awarded workmen’s compensation benefits. The referee’s…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Koszowski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Fuhrman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. General Machine Products Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Henderson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
3Cited by10 opinions
- Langford v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Piergalski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Larry Pitt & Associates, P.C. v. ButlerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- John A. Miller & Associates, Ltd. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.