Legal Opinion

Piergalski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 5, 1993PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLINS, Judge.

Anthony Piergalski, as administrator of the estate of David Piergalski, and Morton B. Debroff, Esquire, petition for review of the October 1, 1991 decision and order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board).

On appeal, the only remaining question is whether Morton B. Debroff, Esquire (Debroff), as attorney for David Piergalski (claimant), is entitled to attorney’s fees in the amount of 20% of the medical expenses, that claimant recovered in his workmen’s compensation claim through Debroff s representation.

This case comes before the Court after numerous proceedings…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Koszowski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. General Machine Products Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Wommer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Raulston v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Larry Pitt & Associates, P.C. v. ButlerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Harney v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Nichols v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Ramsey Construction)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. P. Righter v. WCAB (Righter Parking)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Larry Pitt & Associates, P.C. v. ButlerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API