Legal Opinion

Koszowski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 15, 1991No. 1710 and 1793 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*256SMITH, Judge.

Before this Court are the cross petitions for review of Donald Koszowski (Claimant) and Greyhound Lines, Inc. (Employer) from the July 30, 1990 order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the referee’s decision denying Employer’s petition for termination, suspension or modification (termination petition). The referee ordered Employer to continue paying Claimant workers’ compensation benefits under The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act1 (Act) and to pay all medical expenses set forth in the referee’s decision. The referee further ordered that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Lewis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Eugenie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Gallo v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Buczynski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Gillyard v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Thao to v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Hall v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API