Commercial Finance Co. v. Holder
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.
The assignments of error presented on this appeal are based upon exceptions to the rulings of the trial court in respect to the demurrer filed by plaintiff, and appear to be well taken. G.S. 1-137 (1) and (2). See also Hancammon v. Carr, 229 N.C. 52, 47 S.E. 2d 614; Smith v. Gibbons, 230 N.C. 600, 54 S.E. 2d 924.
The answer of a defendant must contain a statement of any new matter constituting a defense or counterclaim . . . etc. G.S. 1-135. Such counterclaim “must be one existing in favor of a defendant and against a plaintiff between whom a several judgment might be had in the action, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Katzenstein v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Hancammon v. . CarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Hodges v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Smith v. Young Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Bazemore v. . BridgersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. RumfeltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Myers v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Perry v. DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Commercial Credit Corporation v. Robeson MotorsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Hill v. HILL SPINNING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.