Legal Opinion

Hodges v. Wilmington & Weldon Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1890PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Actiox, before Arm,field, J, determined upon demurrer at November Term, 1889, FIarNEtt Superior Court. From judgment overruling demurrer, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Clare, J.:

The complaint alleges that, by reason of the road bed of defendant, erected over plaintiff’s land, the water was ponded back-water sobbing his land and damaging his crops; and, secondly, that it was the duty of the defendant to erect good and sufficient cattle-guards at the points of entrance and exit of its track upon plaintiff’s enclosed land, and, by reason of failure to comply with such duty, stock had passed into plaintiff’s enclosure and damaged his crops; thirdly, that the building of defendant’s road-bed and embankment, had turned the natural flow of the water, causing deep…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. New York & New Haven Railroad v. SchuylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Carrol v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Bullard v. BellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1817
  4. Kortright v. Buffalo Commercial BankNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  5. Logan v. . WallisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Purcell v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Austin, Commissioner v. StrongTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Benton v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. M. Pretzfelder & Co. v. Merchants' InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. Martin v. . GoodeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API