Legal Opinion

Perry v. Doub

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 23, 1953No. 450PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

G.S. 1-123 provides in part: “The plaintiff may unite in the same complaint several causes of action, of legal or equitable nature, or both, where they all arise out of- — ■ ... 2. Contract, express or implied.”

Here all five causes of action declared on in the complaint arise out of contract. The first two are for the recovery, by way of recoupment as against the defendant Robertson, for moneys alleged to have been wrongfully withheld by him under the loan contracts of $22,000 and $3,000. 47 Am. Jur., Set-off and Counterclaim, Sections 2 and 9. The third and fourth causes are to have the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Greene v. SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Byers v. . ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Byers v. ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Brewington v. LoughranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Smith v. Greensboro Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harrell v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Dunn v. DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Burton v. City of ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Joyner v. McDowell County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Commercial Credit Corporation v. Robeson MotorsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API