State v. Rumfelt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The defendant assigns as error the refusal of the trial court to allow his motion for judgment of nonsuit made when the State rested its case. The defendant contends that G.S. 20-162.1 prescribes that “any person convicted pursuant to this section shall be subject to a penalty of $1.00,” and therefore does not set out a criminal act triable in the criminal courts of the State; but in specific words imposes a penalty to be recovered in a civil action.
The amended warrant upon which the defendant was tried and convicted by a jury in the Superior Court charges a violation of G.S. 20-162. G.S.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. ReisingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. ChouteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- State v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Board of Education v. Town of HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sawyer v. BarbourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- North Carolina School Boards Ass'n v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- Cauble v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Marquart v. MauckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Commercial Credit Corporation v. Robeson MotorsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.