Legal Opinion

Vernon S. v. Jerome C.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1995No. S040932PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARABIAN, J.

Family Code section 7895 provides that, upon request, an appellate court “shall” appoint counsel for an indigent “appellant” appealing “a judgment freeing a child who is a dependent child of the juvenile court from parental custody and control.” The question here is whether an appellate court is required to appoint counsel for a respondent when the trial court *229refused to free the child from parental custody and control and the child was not a juvenile court dependent.

We conclude that Family Code section 7895 requires appellate courts to appoint counsel only for parents…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Adoption of Michael H.California Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re Jacqueline H.California Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Carboni v. ArrospideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re Sade C.California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Los Angeles County Department of Children's Services v. Gregory C.California Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Bighorn-Desert View Water Agency v. VerjilCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Richmond v. Shasta Community Services DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Walter W. v. Jacqueline W.California Supreme Court · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API