Legal Opinion

Cummings v. County of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1961No. L. A. 26156PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*261PETERS, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained when the minor plaintiff was struck by defendant’s automobile. It is contended on this appeal that the giving of certain instructions and the refusal to give others constituted prejudicial error.

The facts pertinent to the problems involved are as follows:

The minor (hereafter referred to as “plaintiff”), who was 7 years old at the time of the accident, was walking on the east shoulder of a public highway with some other boys, all of whom were proceeding north with their…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dingman v. AF Mattock CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Ornales v. WiggerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Mecchi v. Lyon Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Cole v. RidingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Stroud v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ribas v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Lemons v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Daun v. TruaxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Beck v. KesslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Brown v. ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API