Legal Opinion

State v. Crocker

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 24, 1987No. C4-86-1312PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

We granted the state’s petition for review of a decision of the court of appeals which granted defendant Earl William Crocker a new trial on a rape charge 1 and reversed a kidnapping conviction outright. State v. Crocker, 403 N.W.2d 277 (Minn.App.1987). The court granted a new trial on the rape charge because, in the court’s opinion, the trial court prejudicially erred in admitting Spreigl evidence. The court reversed the kidnapping conviction outright because it concluded that the evidence was insufficient. We reverse the court of appeals and reinstate both convictions.

Complain…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Garrett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. State v. FilippiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. BolteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. State v. WermerskirchenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. State v. NorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. State v. WinterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API