Legal Opinion

State v. Wermerskirchen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 12, 1993No. C7-91-1027PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

The court of appeals granted the defendant, Thomas Wermerskirchen, a new trial on a charge he sexually touched his 9-year-old daughter and thereby committed criminal sexual conduct in the second degree, Minn.Stat. § 609.343, subd. 1(a) (1990). 1 The court of appeals ruled (1) that Spreigl or other-crime evidence was properly admitted pursuant to Minn.R.Evid. 404(b) to prove that any touching was intentional but was not properly admitted to prove that any touching occurred and (2) as a result of the prosecutor’s statements in closing argument and the trial court’s instructions…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. State v. FilippiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. RainerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. United States v. Larry Wayne Brown, United States of America v. Larry Edward HendrixCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  5. State v. FrisingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. State v. LoughWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. DeVincentisWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. DeVincentisWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. BolteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. State v. BlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API