Lichtenfeld v. Frederick
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
Esther Liehtenfeld and others (hereinafter referred to as Liehtenfeld) signed a deposit receipt whereby they agreed to buy certain real property of the estate for $325,000, making a deposit of $16,750, the balance to be paid within 60 days. The deposit receipt stated that “should the purchaser fail to pay the balance, of said purchase price, or fail to complete the purchase, as herein provided, the amounts paid hereon may, at the option of the seller, be retained as the consideration for the execution, of this agreement by the seller.”
The executor when signing as seller…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Royer v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Prentice v. North American Title Guaranty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Caplan v. SchroederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Isthmian Lines, Inc. v. Schirmer Stevedoring Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Cook v. King Manor and Convalescent HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- De La Hoya v. Slim's Gun ShopAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.