Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Jensen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1949No. File 7144PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out certain paragraphs of defendants’ counterclaim. The order sought to be reviewed is not appealable and the appeal must be dismissed. Interlocutory orders are appealable only as made so by statute. Ostlund v. Ecklund, 42 ND 83, 171 NW 857; Wall v. First Nat. Bank, 49 ND 703, 193 NW 51; Torgerson v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. Ste. M. R. Co. 51 ND 745, 200 NW 1013;. 3 CJ 488, § 316; 4 CJS 226. Section 28-2702, ND Rev Code 1943, provides what orders maybe reviewed on appeal to the supreme court. This section reads:

“28-2702. The…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Bolton v. DonavanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Stimson v. StimsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Ellingson v. Northwestern Jobbers Credit BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Baird v. LeforNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Burdick v. MannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Herzog v. YuillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Chas. F. Ellis Agency, Inc. v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Schaff v. KennellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Berg v. Dakota Boys Ranch Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Sand v. Queen City Packing CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API