Legal Opinion

Baird v. Lefor

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1924PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.

This appeal raises questions touching the constitutionality and effect of chapter 137, Session Laws, 1923. The primary matters of fact necessary to an understanding of the case and the points involved are as follows: L. R. Baird, the plaintiff, was appointed as receiver of banks in process of liquidation under the provisions of chapter 137, supra, by the Honorable Chas. 1VL Cooley, one of the judges of the First Judicial District of the State of North Dakota. Judge Cooley was designated by this court under the provisions of § 18 of chapter 137, supra, to hear and determine actions to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Price v. AbbottU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1883
  2. Stanton v. WilkesonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1876
  3. Platt v. BeachDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1868
  4. Speckart v. German Nat. BankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1898
  5. Aldrich v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Warwick v. State Ex Rel. ChanceAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Clifford v. West Hartford Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  3. State v. . WhitehurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Burdick v. MannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State v. WhitehurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API