Legal Opinion

Berg v. Dakota Boys Ranch Ass'n

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 2001No. 20000301PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] The Dakota Boys Ranch Association (“Boys Ranch”) appeals from a trial court order, 1 arguing the trial court erred in denying summary judgment and in admitting an exhibit into evidence. We affirm.

I

[¶2] Evan Berg worked at the Boys Ranch. On November 20, 1996, the Boys Ranch terminated his employment. The parties disputed the reasons for his termination. Berg claimed he was terminated for reporting suspected child abuse. The Boys Ranch claimed he was terminated for allowing a subordinate to leave early and covering for her. Although Berg did not work after November 20,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hellman v. ThieleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Herzog v. YuillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Schaff v. KennellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  4. In Re Estate of DionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Stormon v. District CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Olander Contracting Co. v. Gail Wachter InvestmentsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Kartes v. KartesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Estate of Vaage v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Henry v. SECURITIES COMM'R FOR STATENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Morgan v. VestreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API