Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Ross

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 18, 1963No. 16,084PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

Contending that certain evidence, admitted over his objection, was obtained as a result of an illegal search and seizure, the accused asks for reversal of his conviction for several offenses, including unlawful sale of advance copies of Navy promotion examinations, in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

The accused, who was in charge of the Post Office on the U. S. S. KEAR-SARGE, and an accomplice, offered to sell to Shipfitter First Class Daniel Cronin a copy of a scheduled service-wide promotion examination. After some preliminary talks…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Kremen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. JacobyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. KinaneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  3. United States v. DeckerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  4. United States v. SimpsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  5. United States v. WheelerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API