Legal Opinion

Hine v. Dittrich

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 22, 1991No. D010802PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WIENER, J.

Cross-complainant Edward Jacob Hine appeals a summary judgment in favor of cross-defendants General Dynamics Corporation and John Dittrich. We affirm as to General Dynamics and reverse as to Dittrich.

Factual and Procedural Background

Facts

Hine and Dittrich were machinists at General Dynamics. At best their relationship was stormy. According to the allegations in Hine’s cross-complaint, Dittrich told other employees that Hine was chasing Dittrich’s wife. Dittrich allegedly threatened Hine, approaching him with clenched fists. Dittrich bought a shotgun with the intent of sawing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Newman v. Emerson Radio Corp.California Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Royal Globe Insurance v. WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hunter v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Stiefel v. Bechtel Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2007
  4. Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Howe v. Target CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API