Legal Opinion

Howe v. Target Corporation

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 21, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00252Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EMILY HOWE, Case No. 20-cv-252-MMA (DEB) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS; AND 14 TARGET CORPORATION, DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION 15 Defendant. TO STRIKE 16 [Doc. No. 16] 17 18 19 In her Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), Emily Howe (“Plaintiff”) alleges 20 seven causes of action: (1) breach of implied contract; (2) breach of implied covenant of 21 good faith and fair dealing; (3) wrongful termination in violation of public policy; (4) 22 wrongful…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API