Legal Opinion

Lazar v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1996No. S044234PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

12 Cal.4th 631 (1996)

909 P.2d 981

49 Cal. Rptr.2d 377

ANDREW LAZAR, Petitioner,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; RYKOFF-SEXTON, INC., Real Party in Interest.

Docket No. S044234.

Supreme Court of California.

January 29, 1996.

COUNSEL

Ross & Morrison, Gary B. Ross, Andrew D. Morrison, Schulman & Miller, Barry A. Schulman and Jerry Miller for Petitioner.

William G. Hoerger, Luis Jaramillo, Joseph Posner, Quackenbush & Quackenbush and William C. Quackenbush as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Martin C. Washton and Jeffrey F.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tindell v. Murphy, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. In re First American Home Buyers Protection Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2016
  3. Ireland v. Discover EmployeesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API