In re the Claim of West
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*1252Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 16, 2002, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant, a janitor, was suspended for three days for not abiding by the employer’s directive to provide a doctor’s note to explain a recent absence. Claimant was discharged when he failed to return to work at the end of the three days or thereafter contact the employer. Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decision that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of CranstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of RaykinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of KanberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of McDadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Claim of PetersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of RoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004