Legal Opinion
E.N. v. Special School District No. 1
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 21, 1999No. C1-99-974PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY, * Judge.
An administrative review officer applied the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure to decide an issue of service of a notice on an appeal from a hearing officer’s decision under the state’s special education laws. Although we find that the officer erred in deciding the service of notice issue, we nevertheless affirm because the officer had jurisdiction to consider and decide both the appeal and cross-appeal based on the opposing party’s initial adequate filing.
FACTS
This appeal concerns only procedural issues in an administrative appeal under Minnesota’s special…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Arvig Telephone Co. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Spurck v. Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Metropolitan CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gibson Ex Rel. Gibson v. Forest Hills Local School District Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Independent School District No. 709 v. BonneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re the Risk Level Determination of J.V.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- In re the Expulsion of Z.K.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Reynolds v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.