Legal Opinion
In Re the Risk Level Determination of J.V.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 27, 2007No. A06-2286PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Judge.
In this certiorari proceeding, relator challenges an administrative law judge’s (ALJ) order dismissing his request for administrative review of his risk-level assessment under Minn.Stat. § 244.052, arguing that his right to review is unconditional and absolute. Because we conclude that the ALJ did not err in concluding that relator’s request for administrative review was moot, we affirm.
FACTS
In July 2001, relator was convicted of fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct and the district court sentenced him to 33 months in prison. Over the next two years, relator was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Risk Level Determination of D.W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Great Gulf Corporation v. R.P. Air Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- In Re DwCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009