Legal Opinion

Gibson Ex Rel. Gibson v. Forest Hills Local School District Board of Education

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 15, 2016No. Case 14-3575, 14-3833, 14-3834, 15-3833UnpublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act requires participating states to provide a “free and appropriate public education” (“FAPE”) to school-aged children who have disabilities. At issue in these consolidated appeals is whether the Forest Hills Local School District (“Forest Hills”) provided a FAPE to Chloe Gibson, now a twenty-four-year-old Ohio resident who attended Forest Hills schools as a child and teenager. The district court held that For est Hills denied Chloe a FAPE by failing to adequately plan for her postsecondary future. The court ordered injunctive…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. J.A. v. Smith Cnty. Sch. Dist.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
  2. P.G. v. Rutherford Cnty. Bd. of Educ.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
  3. Jane Doe v. Knox Cnty. Bd. of Educ.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  4. S.H. v. Rutherford Cnty. Sch.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
  5. Jacob Bradley v. Jefferson Cnty. Public Schs.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API