Legal Opinion

Sinclair Pipe Line Co. v. Village of Richton Park

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1960No. 35418PublishedCited by 162 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

Three questions are presented for decision in this zoning case. The first is whether the plaintiffs are entitled to maintain the action against the contention that thev failed to exhaust their administrative remedies before commehciñg it. The second involves the correctness of the judgment of the trial court in holding the provisions of the applicable zoning ordinance unreasonable and invalid insofar as it applies to the property of the plaintiffs. The third concerns the kind of relief that may be ordered by a court after it has determined that an existing zoning ordinance is invalid.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Lake Forest v. County of LakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Fifteen Fifty North State Building Corp. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Deer Park Civic Ass'n v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  4. Nott v. WolffIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  5. La Salle National Bank v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by162 opinions

  1. Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Treadway v. City of RockfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Tim Thompson, Inc. v. Village of HinsdaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Mobil Oil Corp. v. City of Rocky RiverOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Hartung v. Village of SkokieIllinois Supreme Court · 1961

157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API