Legal Opinion
Patterson v. Stover
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 10, 1987No. C5-86-1271PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Following a trial without jury, the trial court found that appellants Stover, et al. had failed to convey property under a purchase agreement and that respondent Patterson had suffered damages in the amount of $40,000. Appellants argue that the trial court erred in finding there was an enforceable contract between the parties and in finding that appellants’ actions caused-the delay in closing. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent, a commercial real estate agent, entered into a purchase agreement with appellants to purchase a mobile home park and adjacent parcel of undeveloped land.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Romain v. Pebble Creek PartnersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Gifford v. VoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Miracle Construction Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Appollo v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dayton Development Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. Gilman Financial Services, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Nutrisoya Foods, Inc. v. SUNRICH LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Dayton Development v. Gilman FinancialCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- OptumHealth Care Solutions, LLC v. Sports Concussion Institute Global, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Rochester MSA Building Company v. UMB Bank, N.A., TrusteeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023