Legal Opinion

Anstine v. McWilliams

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1945No. 29617PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, C. J.

June 17,1944, Wanda Lee Anstine, her husband, Robert W. Anstine being then on military duty overseas, purchased from the defendant H. T. McWilliams, who was engaged in the business of automobile financing in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, a Ford coupe, 1940 model, at the price of $975. Mrs. Anstine received a credit on the purchase price of the car in the sum of $375 as an allowance for a car which she had previously owned, leaving due a balance of $600. In addition, she agreed to pay $17.20 for insurance and $154.40, which was described as a “time price differential” charged for the privilege of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bloom v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  2. Hawver v. . BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Enos v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  4. In Re FreemanDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1943
  5. Fugate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cheesman v. SathreWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Dennis v. SouthworthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  3. Becwar v. BearWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Crutcher v. Scott Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API