Rodriguez v. State

OPINION

DORSEY, Justice.

A jury convicted appellant Francisco Rodriguez of aggravated robbery and assessed punishment at 25 years imprisonment. In eight points of error, appellant presents questions regarding evidentiary sufficiency, possible defectiveness of the indictment, adequacy of the jury charge, and the constitutionality of parole jury instructions. It is necessary that the judgment be set aside and that the cause be remanded to the trial court.

Viewing the evidence in the light most consistent with the finding of guilt, the evidence may be summarized as follows:

At 12:55 a.m. on October…