Sanders v. State

SPARLING, Justice.

Tony Curtis Sanders appeals a conviction for aggravated rape in which a jury assessed punishment at 99 years imprisonment. We find no merit in any of appel lant’s six grounds of error. Accordingly, we affirm.

In appellant’s first ground of error he contends that the trial court erred in denying his pre-trial motion to require the State to provide the names of witnesses it intended to present at the punishment stage of the trial. In response to the motion the State said that the law did not require its punishment witnesses’ names to be divulged before trial. The trial court…