Legal Opinion

Houston v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 1, 1984No. 536-82PublishedCited by 398 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

McCORMICK, Judge.

This Court granted appellant’s motion for leave to file his motion for rehearing from the refusal of his petition for discretionary review in order to consider the correct stan dard for the review of cases based on circumstantial evidence. Appellant specifically asked that we announce the correct standard as being one in which the appellate court reviews the evidence in light of the presumption that the accused is innocent.

Subsequent to granting appellant’s motion for leave to file, we handed down a group…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carlsen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Denby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

3Cited by398 opinions

  1. Livingston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. McGee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Bower v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

393 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API