Legal Opinion
Greene v. Lam Amusement Co.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided March 5, 1956No. Civ. Nos. 5287, 5300, 5307PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SLOAN, District Judge.
The defendants in the above stated cases have filed motions that the Court determine at this time the applicable statute of limitations which is applicable.
The Court is of the opinion that this question should be determined at this time in order that such ruling may be considered in determining the limits of reasonable discovery to be permitted in the cases.
Plaintiffs insist that the 20 year statute of limitations provided by Georgia Code, § 3-704 is applicable, while the defendants insist that the 1 year statute provided by Georgia Code, § 3-714 is applicable, but that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- City of Atlanta v. Chattanooga Foundry & PipeworksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
- Bigby v. DouglasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Fulton v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1953
- City of Atlanta v. Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- UNITED BANANA COMPANY v. United Fruit CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1959
- Carter v. Atlanta Enterprises, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1956
- Leh v. General Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Leh v. General Petroleum Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1962
- Service Stages, Inc. v. Greyhound Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.