Legal Opinion
City of Atlanta v. Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee
Decided May 5, 1900No. Nos. 647, 599PublishedCited by 15 opinions
On Demurrers to Pleas Interposing tbe Defense of tbe Statute of Limitations of Tenbessee.'
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, District Judge.
These suits are brought to recover damages under section 7 of the so-called “Anti-Trust Act” of congress of' July 2,1890, which reads as follows:
“Any person who shall he injured in his business or properly by any oilier person or corporation by reason of anything forbidden or declared to be unlawful by this act, may sue therefor in any circuit court of the United Slates in-the district in which the defendant resides or is found, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover three fold the damages by Mm sustained, and the costs of suit, including a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Campbell v. HaverhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HumesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Cooper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Roseland v. Phister Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Leonia Amusement Corp. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Englander Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Reid v. Doubleday & Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.