Legal Opinion

Duyck v. Tualatin Valley Irrigation District

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 13, 1986No. 41-164; CA A32381PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment for plaintiffs on plaintiffs’ negligence claim. Plaintiffs cross-appeal, challenging the partial summary judgment on and dismissal of their breach of contract claim. We reverse on the appeal and affirm on the cross-appeal.

Plaintiffs own several farms, including the Gun Club Farm and the Gregg Farm in Washington County. Defendant is an irrigation district and a public body under the Oregon Tort Claims Act. ORS 30.260. Plaintiffs were members of defendant and paid members’ fees and assessments. Defendant was formed to act as the spokesman and information source for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Dowers Farms, Inc. v. Lake CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Payless Drug Stores Northwest v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Mathies v. HoeckOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Peterson v. Multnomah County School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Duyck v. Tualatin Valley Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Frame v. Boatmen's Bank of Concord VillageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Duyck v. Tualatin Valley Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Duyck v. Tualatin Valley Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API