Legal Opinion
Duyck v. Tualatin Valley Irrigation District
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 22, 1987No. TC 41-164; CA A32381; SC S33201Published
1Opinion of the Court
742 P.2d 1176 (1987)
304 Or. 151
Lloyd DUYCK and Geraldine Duyck, Petitioners On Review,
v.
TUALATIN VALLEY IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Respondent On Review.
TC 41-164; CA A32381; SC S33201.
Supreme Court of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted January 20, 1987.
Decided September 22, 1987.
Thomas J. Moore, Hillsboro, argued the cause for petitioners on review. With him on the brief was Brink, Moore, Brink & Peterson, Hillsboro.
Alfred T. McGill, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review.
Before PETERSON, C.J., and LENT, LINDE, CAMPBELL, CARSON and JONES, JJ.
PETERSON, Chief Justice.
The plaintiffs brought this…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
- United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.