Legal Opinion · Dissent

Duyck v. Tualatin Valley Irrigation District

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1987No. TC 41-164; CA A32381; SC S33201Published

1DissentCampbell, J.

I dissent. The original complaint in this case was filed on June 18, 1980, and for the purposes of this dissent it is assumed that a two year statute of limitations applies and that Oregon recognizes the tort of negligent misrepresentation under Restatement (Second) Torts, § 552.

The plaintiffs’ third amended complaint contains two causes of action and each cause contains two counts. This review concerns only the second count of each cause of action which alleges that the defendant acted in a negligent manner in one or more of the following particulars:

“(1) In representing to plaintiffs that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Dowers Farms, Inc. v. Lake CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Fuller v. FullerIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Duyck v. Tualatin Valley Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API