Legal Opinion

Toner v. Lederle Laboratories

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 16, 1987No. 84-3906PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:

This products liability case presented questions of state law which we certified to the Idaho Supreme Court. Toner v. Lederle Laboratories, 779 F.2d 1429 (9th Cir.1986). That court having issued a full opinion in response to the certification, Toner v. Lederle Laboratories, 112 Idaho 328, 732 P.2d 297 (1987), we now complete our disposition of the appeal, and we affirm the judgment for the plaintiff based on the jury’s finding of negligence.

The facts are set forth in detail in our previous opinion. 779 F.2d at 1430-31. Kevin Toner, the plaintiff in the trial court, was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Stephens v. StearnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Toner v. Lederle LaboratoriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  2. Golonka v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. Carr v. StrodeHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  5. Miyamoto v. LumHawaii Supreme Court · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API