Legal Opinion

United States v. State Forwarding & Shipping Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 21, 1925No. 2482PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BlaND,-Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The appraiser’s answer to the protest in this case described the merchandise as "toy tennis balls * * * composed of various materials suitable only for the amusement of children. It was returned for duty as toys at 70 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1414 of the act of 1922.”

The goods were invoiced as felt tennis balls. There is before us no sample of the merchandise taken from the importation, but at the hearing before the board illustrative Exhibit A was introduced, which is before the court, and consists of a purple-colored ball of light…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Illfelder v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. StraussCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. United States v. FieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. United States v. Kelley Hardware Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  5. United States v. Stewart Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grunberg v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API