Legal Opinion

United States v. Stewart Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 6, 1925No. 2437PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The official sample of the merchandise here is a fancifully colored, hollow rubber ball, about 8 inches in diameter, with two pictures on the outer surface representing children at play. The importation consisted of similar balls varying in diameter from 5 to 8 inches.

They were classified by the collector as toys under paragraph 1414 of the tariff act of 1922, the relevant part of which we quote:

Dolls, and parts of dolls, doll heads, toy marbles, of whatever materials composed, air rifles, toy balloons, * * * and all other toys, and parts of toys, not composed of china,, porcelain, parían,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. State Forwarding & Shipping Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Protests 956554-G of BambergerUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  4. United States v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API