Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Barton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 2, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
We affirm. The dishonesty of an employee has been held to constitute misconduct disqualifying him or her from receiving unemployment insurance benefits, particularly where the employment at issue requires a high standard of honesty and integrity (see Matter of Zaydman [Roman Roytberg, Inc., P.C.— Commissioner of Labor], 87 AD3d 1192, 1193 [2011]; Matter of Singleton [Commissioner of Labor], 60 AD3d 1230, 1231 [2009]). Here, substantial evidence supports the Board’s determination that, after being instructed not to discuss the investigation with anyone, claimant indeed discussed it with her…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of ZaydmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Claim of MorarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In rethe Claim of SingletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tyler v. George Washington Medical Faculty AssociatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re the Claim of DitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re the Claim of DitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012