Legal Opinion

Stockmen's State Bank v. Merchants' & Stockgrowers' Bank

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1921No. Civil No. 1819PublishedCited by 9 opinions

[APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Apache. P. H. Lyman, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.

This is an action by the Merchants’ & Stockgrowers’ Bank, administrator of the estate of Nasif Tamer, deceased, against the Stockmen’s State Bank, administrator of the estate of Lucy Elia Castillo, deceased, for the recovery of $4,955, the value of 354 head of sheep, twenty-four stock cattle, and two work horses. Prom a judgment against it for $3,540, the value of the sheep, and an order de*356nying its motion for a new trial, appellant brings this appeal.

Nasif Tamer, a Syrian by birth, but for many years a resident of Apache county, Arizona, died there December 23, 1916, and on February 10,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Austin v. . MunroNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Ferrin v. . MyrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. Eustace v. JahnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Sterrett v. BarkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Trustees of the University of North Carolina v. State National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Markel v. Transamerica Title Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Elerick v. RocklinArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Tom Reed Gold Mines Co. v. United Eastern Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Jackson v. American Credit Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API