Legal Opinion
Tom Reed Gold Mines Co. v. United Eastern Mining Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1932No. Civil No. 2954PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
United Eastern Mining Company, a corporation, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against Tom Beed Gold Mines Company, a corporation, hereinafter called defendant, to recover damages for the alleged removal by defendant of certain ore from the mine of plaintiff. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $20,000, and the matter is before us for review.
The assignments of error in effect present only the question of whether the statute of limitations was properly applied. It is the contention of plaintiff that the action is governed by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Lewey v. H. C. Fricke Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- First Massachusetts Turnpike Corp. v. FieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- Moore v. MeyersArizona Supreme Court · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Walk v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- 509 Sixth Avenue Corp. v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- Morrison v. ActonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Mayer v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.