Legal Opinion

State v. Tobin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2007No. 78628-3PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Douglas Tobin pleaded guilty to illegally harvesting large amounts of crab and geoduck from Puget Sound. The victims were the State and the Puyallup, Squaxin, and Nisqually tribes. The trial court ordered Tobin to pay restitution for, among other things, the State’s extraordinary investigative and administrative costs and the cost of resurveying impacted geoduck tracts. Tobin now argues that these costs were not sufficiently related to his crimes to justify their inclusion in his restitution. However, these costs were caused by Tobin’s criminal activity, and

Bridge, J.

*520Tobin has not shown…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. DavisonWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. State v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. CawyerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. Minehart v. MORNING STAR BOYS RANCH, INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API