Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bryant v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1996No. 94-1093PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Claimant seeks to compel a permanent total disability compensation award pursuant to State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. Upon review, we find such relief to be inappropriate, and return the cause to the commission for further consideration and amended order pursuant to State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245.

Preliminary to any consideration of relief pursuant to Gay is a finding that Noll has not been met. State ex rel. Sebestyen v. Indus. Comm. (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 36, 38, 641 N.E.2d 197, 199. Noll noncompliance in this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Pass v. C.S.T. Extraction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Sebestyen v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Draganic v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Moss v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Ehlinger v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Bryant v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Moss v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API