Legal Opinion

Lincoln v. Pieper

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1990No. 90-095PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

The defendants Wesley J. Pieper and Faye E. Pieper appeal the order of the Montana Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, granting partial summary judgment to plaintiffs Robert C. and Megan Lincoln and Jack and Beth Noland, holding that the Lincolns and Nolands have a right to use a water system passing through the defendants’ and the plaintiffs’ properties. We affirm.

The Piepers raise the following issues on appeal:(1) Did the District Court err in holding that a conveyance of land and a water right “with appurtenances” from the parties’ common grantor created and transferred an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tucker v. JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Musselshell Valley Farming & Livestock Co. v. CooleyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Castillo v. KunnemannMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Connolly v. HarrelMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Thomas v. BarnumMontana Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wills Cattle Co. v. ShawMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Flaig v. GrammMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Wills Cattle Co. v. ShawMontana Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API